According to Megan Mcardle people are having less children because they know social security will take care of them in their declining years, and we all know the only reason to have kids is that they lead to economic benefits for the parents. I cannot see any other reason to bring a bunch of poop flinging yard apes into my life, and thanks to social security I don’t have to. Just the fact that social security keeps people from having 12 kids is reason enough to make sure that it stays solvent no matter how high taxes have to go. Plus, if you are one of those people who for some bizzarre reason wants to have kids, at least thanks to social security you wont be a burden to them, and fortunately you will not have to live with them. Trust me proud dads out there, your children don’t want to change your diapers in your declining years.Â
-
Archives
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
-
Meta
how could a person who eschews children and population replacement deign to support an entitlement program dependent on what is meant to be eliminated.
this reminds me of Mevlin Udall’s literary technique of “taking away reason an accountability”.
I don’t think the earth or the US is in any danger of running out of people. It is silly to argue that people will stop reproducing if they don’t need children for retirment. I doubt that retirement planning enters into most peoples decision as whether or not to have children and if someone decides not to have children because they know social security will take care of them, maybe they should not have childeren anyways.
No children paying into Soc Sec, no elderly collecting out of it. Take a stand, and call for it’s shutdown. Is there another logical conclusion that I’m missing?
This was relevant, and wicked interesting:
Selling Children to Finance Retirement
Hmmm, was that link in comment .4. censored?
I’m hoping not, as the leaders of this site have been very gracious hosts. Even if it was, hey it’s your site.