What I hope for is a Super Bowl featuring Denver vs. Seattle. What I think will happen…Denver vs. Carolina, with the Panthers winning it all.
-
Archives
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
-
Meta
I saw a poll last week where only 11% thought Seattle would win the superbowl. The Steelers were first and Carolina and Denver were in the middle. The Steelers have been pretty badass in the post season so the Superbowl will be very tough for the Hawks. We won’t have the 12th man either and the Steelers have been to the Superbowl more times than I can count.
Go Seahawks!!!!
I’m torn on this game here…my brother thinks Pittsburgh is in the driver’s seat, but Seattle’s front seven has been SO effective.
I’m really glad that a lopsided championship weekend turned out such a compelling superbowl matchup!
You were 100% right about Carolina’s running game Right – – – I thought it wouldn’t matter, but clearly, I had my head up my ass.
Seattle by 10.
Chris, are you running a thread for Superbowl?
I will be in about…hmm, that’s what I’m doing next. I was going to babble about the state of the union, but the superbowl is the right way to go. Congrats Right! Pics on the way?
I forgot Right is a Seattle fan. I cannot decide who to root for, probably will cheer for who ever is behind.
Of course now that I am a conservative I should probably cheer for who ever is in the lead.
Who would Jesus want to win. God must not like Hasselbach or he would not be bald, I guess that settles it I am rooting for the Steelers.
Congrats Right! Pics on the way?
Hmmm….you should have them already. I’ll see if I got the e-mail returned.
God must not like Hasselbach or he would not be bald, I guess that settles it I am rooting for the Steelers.
This logic appears to be similar to that you use to choose a presidential nominee. Kerry is an uber-wealthy, war-hero-fraud so he should be a great president. But it just didn’t turn out that way.
I have to go now, since we lost the war in Iraq the al-queda commander who is in charge of the Las Vegas de-militarized zone has issued a curfew and I will be shot if I venture out after dark.
If Karl had just rooted for the Seahawks, al-queda would never have conquered America!!!
I thought Wayne Newton was in charge of Las Vegas.
Bush really is better than Reagon:
Reagan ignored warnings of attack that killed 241 soldiers
By CALVIN WOODWARD
Jan 31, 2006, 08:34
Email this article
Printer friendly page
A former defense secretary for Ronald Reagan says he implored the president to put Marines serving in Beirut in a safer position before terrorists attacked them in 1983, killing 241 servicemen.
“I was not persuasive enough to persuade the president that the Marines were there on an impossible mission,” Caspar Weinberger says in an oral history project capturing the views of former Reagan administration officials.
You know who else ignored terrorists? Woodrow Wilson.