Cheney ‘cabal’ hijacked foreign policy

From the Financial Times. This is the guy who came out against John Bolton during his confirmation hearing. High-level military officers know how to keep a secret, but they’re also USA to the bone. The crackerjack patriotism America is so absorbed with doesn’t have nearly the depth. Most of us think of a ‘military career’ as 20 tough years, but not these people. When they speak out like Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson has here, it’s difficult to pin down a ‘nuh-uh’.

Vice-President Dick Cheney and a handful of others had hijacked the government’s foreign policy apparatus, deciding in secret to carry out policies that had left the US weaker and more isolated in the world, the top aide to former Secretary of State Colin Powell claimed on Wednesday.

In a scathing attack on the record of President George W. Bush, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, chief of staff to Mr Powell until last January, said: “What I saw was a cabal between the vice-president of the United States, Richard Cheney, and the secretary of defense, Donald Rumsfeld, on critical issues that made decisions that the bureaucracy did not know were being made.

“Now it is paying the consequences of making those decisions in secret, but far more telling to me is America is paying the consequences.”

Mr Wilkerson said such secret decision-making was responsible for mistakes such as the long refusal to engage with North Korea or to back European efforts on Iran.

It also resulted in bitter battles in the administration among those excluded from the decisions.

“If you’re not prepared to stop the feuding elements in the bureaucracy as they carry out your decisions, you are courting disaster. And I would say that we have courted disaster in Iraq, in North Korea, in Iran.”

The comments, made at the New America Foundation, a Washington think-tank, were the harshest attack on the administration by a former senior official since criticisms by Richard Clarke, former White House terrorism czar, and Paul O’Neill, former Treasury secretary, early last year.

Mr Wilkerson said his decision to go public had led to a personal falling out with Mr Powell, whom he served for 16 years at the Pentagon and the State Department.

“He’s not happy with my speaking out because, and I admire this in him, he is the world’s most loyal soldier.”

Among his other charges:

? The detainee abuse at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere was “a concrete example” of the decision-making problem, with the president and other top officials in effect giving the green light to soldiers to abuse detainees. “You don’t have this kind of pervasive attitude out there unless you’ve condoned it.”

? Condoleezza Rice, the former national security adviser and now secretary of state, was “part of the problem”. Instead of ensuring that Mr Bush received the best possible advice, “she would side with the president to build her intimacy with the president”.

? The military, particularly the army and marine corps, is overstretched and demoralised. Officers, Mr Wilkerson claimed, “start voting with their feet, as they did in Vietnam. . . and all of a sudden your military begins to unravel”.

Mr Wilkerson said former president George H.W. Bush “one of the finest presidents we have ever had” understood how to make foreign policy work. In contrast, he said, his son was “not versed in international relations and not too much interested in them either”.

“There’s a vast difference between the way George H.W. Bush dealt with major challenges, some of the greatest challenges at the end of the 20th century, and effected positive results in my view, and the way we conduct diplomacy today.”

By Edward Alden in Washington

www.newamerica.net

This entry was posted in Words. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Cheney ‘cabal’ hijacked foreign policy

  1. Paul says:

    Interesting Chris. I would love to hear Colin Powell’s view on Cheney, Rumsfeld et al. That might peek my interest even more.

  2. Chris Austin says:

    Update on this story:

    New Story – LINK

    Wilkerson’s statements are growing in terms of the information he’s providing. This guy is talking a lot about all of this with a lot of people who’ve got more ammo for him to use. The disengaged posture of Bush is what’s most troubling to me.

    War isn’t something you just delegate and step back from. Here’s what I’m talking about:

    He said Powell now generally believes it was a good idea to remove Saddam from power but may not agree with either the timing or execution of the war.

    “What he seems to be saying to me now is the president failed to discipline the process the way he should have and that the president is ultimately responsible for this whole mess,” Wilkerson said.

Comments are closed.