The party of “no”

Republicans have taken obstructionism to whole new levels and they are not done yet:

….at this point, Republicans realize that they’re taking obstructionism to levels unprecedented in American history, and they realize that the public may disapprove, but they’re willing to take the risk.

Indeed, this week should have made this abundantly clear — Republican obstructionism has reached the level at which they oppose ideas they support.

Conservatives are like spoiled little kids that can’t get what they want so they are throwing a hissy fit about everything. The problem is, conservativism doesn’t work and no amount of foot stamping is ever going to change that, hopefully at some point conservatives will join the rest of us in reality until then look for a lot of temper tantrums from them and very little constructive discourse.

This entry was posted in Words. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The party of “no”

  1. Conservativism is broken down, but so is progressivism. Command and control economies distribute poverty much more effectively than free markets (not that conservatives know much about free markets).

  2. John Rove says:

    Their is a difference between a command economy and what progressives are advocating, a little bit of regulation might go a long way.

  3. I am all for a little bit of regulation.

    Which would mean less than what we have now.

  4. John Rove says:

    I don’t think the banking industry needs less regulation, or the insurance industry for that matter. Probably the food industry could use a little oversight as well.

  5. John Rove says:

    Seriously, what banking regulations would you like to see them do away with? Or any industry for that matter, how is regulation hurting industry?

Comments are closed.